Talking T Gauge Forum Index Talking T Gauge
The Original Forum Dedicated to the World's Smallest Model Railroad Scale
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Gemini Jets 1/400

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Talking T Gauge Forum Index -> T Gauge Products
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Claude_Dreyfus



Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Posts: 12
Location: West Sussex - UK

PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 5:20 pm    Post subject: Gemini Jets 1/400 Reply with quote

I have stumbled across the Gemini Jets range of models http://www.geminijets.com/, which as its name implies mainly centres around model aircraft. There are, however, a large number of accessories - airport buildings, vehicles and the like - available....which has got me thinking. Idea

Does anyone here have experience of matching 1/400 with T gauge, and if so how bearable is the scale difference? Is it similar to 1/148 vs. 1/160 N gauge, or more pronounced? If I were to make some purchases, the airport model would be separated from the tracks to try to hide any differences size - if of course the difference is relatively small.

I am working on the assumption that things like aircraft, being very big, may disguise any discrepancy to a certain extent, plus some judicious 'scenicing' (is that a word?) to try to further deceive the eye....

If I am indeed being daft, and the idea stupid, do let me know (although not in so many words as I am a sensitive soul Wink ), or is this a viable opportunity to make something interesting? Has this already been covered, and I am not looking properly?

Gentlemen; I am at your mercy.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
David K Smith
Chief Cook and Bottle Washer


Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Posts: 435
Location: New Jersey, USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not daft at all, sir.

After quickly glancing through the site to which you linked, it looks as though their accessories are from Herpa, who produce lots of airport-related items--houses, vehicles, parking garages and suchlike--in 1:400 and 1:500, some more useful than others.

I've purchased some of the Herpa Wings accessories. The buildings seem useful, although many of their vehicles are highly stylized and not realistic (they tend to look like architectural miniatures, which are meant to be generic and representative, as opposed to believable). I opted mostly for the 1:500 items, as too small is often less objectionable than too large, IMO.

You can see all of the Herpa merchandise here:

http://www.herpa.de/
_________________
—David

http://www.t-gauge.net/
http://1-450.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
David K Smith
Chief Cook and Bottle Washer


Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Posts: 435
Location: New Jersey, USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This post reminded me to make mention of some other resources that could prove useful for modeling in T. I'll start building a link list soon; meanwhile, Google for suppliers of military, warfare, aircraft and shipbuilding accessory and detail supplies. There's a lot out there... off the top of my head are Gold Medal Models, Tom's, and Lion Roar, to name but a few.
_________________
—David

http://www.t-gauge.net/
http://1-450.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
JohnDMJ



Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Posts: 34
Location: Hampshire - UK

PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Gemini Jets 1/400 Reply with quote

Claude_Dreyfus wrote:
If I am indeed being daft, and the idea stupid, do let me know (although not in so many words as I am a sensitive soul Wink ), or is this a viable opportunity to make something interesting? Has this already been covered, and I am not looking properly?

Gentlemen; I am at your mercy.....


A simple comparison for you: Consider a standard UK 67 foot long coach and scale it:

1:400 = 2.01 inches long
1:450 = 1.78 inches
1:500 = 1.61 inches.

for comparison:

1:148 = 5.43 inches compared to
1:160 = 5.03 inches.

Probably your best bet would be to simply cut out some paper mock-ups at the differing scales and see how they look against eachother. The eye has learned to cope with 0.4 inch difference at N scale but a similar range in T scale could have an altogether different result.

HTH
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Claude_Dreyfus



Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Posts: 12
Location: West Sussex - UK

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would be interesting to see how much 'give' there actually is in this scale. If properly situated, UK (1/148), Japanese (1.150) and 'Continental' (US & Europe - 1/160) N Gauge can co-exist happily on the same layout.... Obviously with the marked difference in size, I wonder if the eye could be more easily disguised, provided of course the items in question are not of the same thing (or very similar).

Going off topic a little, the question of scale obviously does not just apply to size - as in how big are your buildings etc. There is also texture.

I am currently experimenting with green felt as a grass substitute - as I wonder if the usual green scatters and flock powders may be a little too course for T. I don't just want to use green paint for the scenics as this would be a little too flat. I certainly believe this aspect is very much trial and error, and as more layouts are built, so more techniques will be discovered.

Connected with texture is colour. As many may well know, at least one on here has probably heard me go on about this in the past, colour is also subject to scale. The smaller it is, the lighter the shade - in a very general rule of thumb. Especially when looking at grass, colour and texture start to become one of the same.... 1/450 greenery would be smooth (imagine a T Gauge blade of grass Shocked ) and pretty uniform in colour.

As ever, what may be literally correct may not 'look right', so this aspect of T Gauge is very much trial and error.

T Gauge presents some very interesting scenic challenges, purely in view of its size, which I am very much looking forward to looking at, both personally and from other people efforts/experiments...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JohnDMJ



Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Posts: 34
Location: Hampshire - UK

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I take your point effectively about being too mathematical and not sufficiently aesthetic. Unfortunately, that's just me! Wink

However, as a 'quick and dirty' method of checking out the perspectives, I still think a few paper mock-ups to the various scales would either scream out at you or blend well together, especially if used to give depth to the final result (1:400 in the foreground, 1:500 further back)

For further information, I recently saw a model aerodrome at an exhibition; 1:200 scale aircraft with a Z scale (1:220) track servicing supplies. True there was nothing to say that this was a standard gauge line, but the two scales worked well together in that context.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
David K Smith
Chief Cook and Bottle Washer


Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Posts: 435
Location: New Jersey, USA

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Occasionally there will be discussion of "how big is a __ scale brick?" I've found that strict accuracy in the smaller scales does not aways yield the most satisfying results. I model in HO, N and Z, and now that I've started working in T, I'm finding that that this "rule" appears to be ona grade: the smaller the scale, the less satisfying accuracy appears to be. I think that part of this is an effect of visual cues. If a brick texture is not evident, there is not enough visual cue to let us know that it's brick. I'm working on a blog piece discussing this in more depth.
_________________
—David

http://www.t-gauge.net/
http://1-450.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Claude_Dreyfus



Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Posts: 12
Location: West Sussex - UK

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JohnDMJ wrote:
I take your point effectively about being too mathematical and not sufficiently aesthetic. Unfortunately, that's just me! Wink

However, as a 'quick and dirty' method of checking out the perspectives, I still think a few paper mock-ups to the various scales would either scream out at you or blend well together, especially if used to give depth to the final result (1:400 in the foreground, 1:500 further back)



Yes, I agree with your point about mock-ups, especially when a fair amount of money is potentially at stake. Certainly any planned layout will involve the playing around with lots of little bits of cardboard.

I'm not too good at the mathematics, however whilst we are at present fishing around suppliers of other scales (1/400 - 1/500), I too accept that a certain mathematical perspective is required; as one man's pleasing aestheticism is quite often another man's dogs dinner...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JohnDMJ



Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Posts: 34
Location: Hampshire - UK

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Claude_Dreyfus wrote:
I'm not too good at the mathematics, however whilst we are at present fishing around suppliers of other scales (1/400 - 1/500), I too accept that a certain mathematical perspective is required; as one man's pleasing aestheticism is quite often another man's dogs dinner...


I couldn't have put it better myself!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Claude_Dreyfus



Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Posts: 12
Location: West Sussex - UK

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

David K Smith wrote:
Occasionally there will be discussion of "how big is a __ scale brick?" I've found that strict accuracy in the smaller scales does not aways yield the most satisfying results. I model in HO, N and Z, and now that I've started working in T, I'm finding that that this "rule" appears to be ona grade: the smaller the scale, the less satisfying accuracy appears to be. I think that part of this is an effect of visual cues. If a brick texture is not evident, there is not enough visual cue to let us know that it's brick. I'm working on a blog piece discussing this in more depth.


That blog piece would be interesting.

The eye needs the definition, which may not be apparent when talking about such small scales, to make something appear convincing. I have found this with two N Gauge models of the GM Class 66, one provided by Bachmann, the other by Dapol.

The Bachmann model has finer lines, and is probably the more accurate of the two in terms of the size of the ribbing along the sides, head-lights etc. The problem is it looks a little anaemic, especially along-side the bolder Dapol model, which although probably a little too agricultural in terms of the fine details, looks (to my eyes) the more convincing of the two.

The model I am planning will, in effect, be intended for hawking around local shows either as a layout in its own right - or as part of a larger demo - as well as a test bed for 'greater things'. I will then get the opportunity to put all my waffle into practice Very Happy .

I'm not just an armchair modeller, honest....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rhtrain@hotmail.com



Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You would be better of using 1/500 scale airplanes and ex. there are more things available. I found 1\300 bridges at GHQ they are a little small for that scale but the stone arch bridge is realy nice and at 14.50 fore a three arch bridge is a good deel.they also have a triple span truss bridge.Im using them on a layout im bilding i will post pictures latter. It is 8 ft.long and 14in.wide,with an airport at one end and a sea port at the other end.there will be 4 trains running on 4 traks 1double line 1 street car line and 1coast line. love t gauge .waitting for swithes. Skytrex sells a line of 1\600 scale war game items that an be used .There trucks armer are a little big for that scale.I compared them with the herpa cars and they are close to the same size
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Talking T Gauge Forum Index -> T Gauge Products All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. Hosted by phpBB.BizHat.com